Sales Compensation for a Consumption Ready Revenue Machine

Before our usual programming, here’s a quick update - Quivly AI won the first place (and a $25k prize 🎉) at the VetsInTech Pitch Contest. Here’s the coverage in PR Newswire. We would love your support in amplifying the news - please like/ repost/ and if you don’t already, please follow us on LinkedIn 🙏 

Usage pricing ties your topline to real customer behavior. That means your comp plan either pushes the team to earn consumption every day, or it pays people to celebrate signatures while usage stalls. We want the former. 

AI has pushed variable cost into the foreground. As compute-heavy features ship, aligning revenue to usage is not optional, and thus incentives for the front line sales force must change as well.

Operators in usage billing are blunt about the operational weight involved. Dropbox and Twilio had similar revenue, but Twilio’s billing team peaked at around 200 people compared to Dropbox’s 50. Incentives that ignore activation and telemetry quality will produce breakage. Pavilion’s analysis showed an 80% revenue delta by year three between a plan that pays mostly at booking and one that rewards multi-year consumption. Clearly, when you incentivize short-term thinking, you get short-term results.

What needs to change when usage drives revenue

Sales compensation and structure for usage and hybrid models must be redesigned with tact and foresight, and cannot remain lopsided. This is how leading consumption businesses set up systems paying reps based on actual consumption, keeping cash flow sane while making activation and sustained draw the center of gravity. 

Pay sellers when customers use the product

• 20% of the variable at signature once legal terms and metering are in place

• 30% at the first billable event that meets your defined threshold

• 50% on realized usage, paid monthly or quarterly in arrears, tied to trailing 90-day net consumption

Establish Fair Cliffs and gates

• No commission until the customer is live and producing billable events

• If a deal lacks executive alignment, treat it as unqualified for commission eligibility. The snapshot’s guidance applies here: if your seller cannot engage the CEO in an enterprise sale, do not pretend it is a real deal yet

Use incentives that encourage ramp over time

• Higher multipliers for consecutive months of target-band usage growth rather than a single spike

• Extra bump when the account reaches healthy commit utilization without overages

• One-time spiffs for go-live inside 30 days, for first production workflow, and for connecting the second data source

Define roles inside the sales team

• Account Executive (AE) owns the initial land and executive alignment. Paid on the same schedule as above, with a smaller share of the variable held for sustained usage after handoff

• Usage or Expansion Reps can be specialist partners between SEs and product teams to activate workloads, expand endpoints, and stabilize the draw. Their plan skews toward realized revenue and net new billable workflows. Think 40% OTE at signature and activation milestones, 60% on usage over time

• Field CTO can be a non quota-carrying partner, having a portion of their bonus tied to the quality of deployments that protect margin per unit and avoid over-commit. The harsh reality is that the hard work now starts at contract close

Make the price meter and contract structure legible

Your comp plan dies if the seller cannot explain what counts as a billable unit and how hybrid credits burn. Give the field three simple options to sell:

• Platform fee plus metered credits with rollover and a small annual discount

• Usage-based tiers with adaptive flat rate at renewal based on actuals

• Draw-down commit with guardrails for enterprise predictability

Growth Unhinged wrote a brilliant piece on this worth referring to. Joe Morrissey, Partner at a16z, also shared his thoughts on usage based sales comp -

Quotas and Curves that balance the field

Quotas. Replace pure bookings quotas with a three-part target: lands, activations, and realized usage. For example: 12 lands, 10 activations within 45 days, 3.2 million credits of realized usage for the portfolio during the year.

Ramp curves by segment. Give each seller a standard usage ramp by cohort that RevOps updates quarterly. The plan measures performance against the expected curve, not only against all-in annual totals. This is the only way to preserve fairness when usage timing varies.

Portfolio logic. Let your best reps build a durable rolodex that pays residuals while they continue to grow it, with performance gates to keep standards high. 

Usage-based pricing creates complex timing issues for compensation. Unlike subscriptions where revenue recognition is predictable, consumption revenue varies month to month.

The most forward-thinking companies are implementing real-time visibility into consumption and compensation. Sales reps can see their earnings impact from customer usage decisions in near real-time, creating immediate feedback loops between customer success and personal compensation.

If you’d like to learn more about how Quivly’s usage-based revenue forecasting engine can help support and incentivize your sales force, we’d love to chat!